My Web, its aim is to greatly spread and disseminate Artificial Soil Technology, but rather I would like it to become a platform for exchanging academic views and a bridge for promoting friendship between people. My Web is never a place for political struggle and political controversy, and I don＇t permit it to carry some articles against the realities, government, party and socialism, and to disseminate some information with low-grade, nasty, pornographic and filthy contents.
I love my motherland and people very much, I support the government and leaders of the Party, I am sure that our future and career will succeed. I believe that today is the best period of our countries situations since 1840. In 20 years（from 2000）, our economical sum（GDP）will be quadrupled. If there was not this big background in our country, there would be no way to carry out my technology and solve the food problem of the Chinese people. Just in this case, I like the others, have the same target, that is how to solve Chinese problems. We all hope to do the best and quickly. The difference between us is different method, and this is permitted and necessary. Everybody knows that we have to keep several programs at hand for large projects, as the proverb goes “狡兔有三窟”（in English it means that a sly and clever rabbit has three caves）, let alone people.
On R-06-2-2003.5.17（即：人造土壤技术阅读材料-浅谈人造土壤战略-2页-2003.5.17写作）and R-07-2-2003.5.17（also：Readings- A Brief Insight into the Strategy of Artificial Soil-Page 2-2003.5.17 to be written ）I have written that ：I maintain that land resources are not limited, but can be regenerated and can be produced on a large scale and at high speed under factory conditions, which opposes sharply to the traditional concept of land resources being limited. If my proposal is accepted, will all those inferences with regard to the development strategy based on land resources being limited, such as agriculture, environment protection, the treatment of sand problems, mining, city planning and the industrial structural adjustment be revised?? 6 years has passed since than. Series of reports《创新2050：科技革命与中国的未来》系列报告<Innovation 2050: Scientific revolutions and China’s future > were written by more than 300 authors from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, including nearly 60 academicians, to describe up to 2050 the road map of developing science and technology in China including? 8 large systems.
My question is if those important reports will be rewritten again？
Those are different academic views, and the correct method and way to solve them are to let everybody say and discuss and argue rather than political attack or class struggle .In present society vast people concern about great things about our country, and they should be given opportunities to express their views.
Even so, here I repeat once, twice, three and four times that if I have not a method to solve the serious Chinese problems completely, I will never say anything. I know greatly this is no trifling matter. If I am not serious, I will be laughed at by foreigners, making the people suffer? horrible psychological panics, making trouble to the government. I will never do such a foolish thing because it will be a real political event then.
Here I repeat my views again if someone can prove that my academic ideas cannot solve the serious Chinese problems completely and make me convinced, then I will go to the police station voluntarily to give myself up, saying：“ I am a criminal and I would like to obey the people’ trial because I have caused loss to our country and the people”.
All these indicate I am selfless and I dare to face the problems in our country and analyze our realities, my target is to solve the problems and change the situation.
I am going to make My Web become a platform for exchanging academic views and a bridge for promoting friendship between people to cause more potential academic views to be seen for everybody.
My Web may be one of the webs to be visited the least, it will try to be one of the best like《nature》in England.